1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 710 F.Supp.
  5. 710 F.Supp. 220 (1989)
 

HAMILTON v. THEZAN

No. 88 C 794.

710 F.Supp. 220 (1989)

Derrick HAMILTON, Plaintiff, v. Lawrence THEZAN and John Fitzsimmons, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

March 9, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alan M. Freedman, Bruce H. Bornstein, Freedman & Bornstein, P.C., Chicago, Daniel T. Coyne, Geary W. Kull, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Michael Lieberman, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Chicago, Ill., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

Derrick Hamilton ("Hamilton") has sued City of Chicago police officers Lawrence Thezan ("Thezan") and John Fitzsimmons ("Fitzsimmons") under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ("Section 1983"), alleging the officers had deprived Hamilton of his liberty in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. Both defendants have moved for summary judgment.1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases