1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 779 S.W.2d
  5. 779 S.W.2d 149 (1989)
 

SHELTER MUT. INS. CO. v. SMITH

No. 89-200.

779 S.W.2d 149 (1989)

300 Ark. 348

SHELTER MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Appellant, v. Amelee SMITH and Ruth Smith, Husband and Wife, and Kathy Lowell, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

November 6, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matthews, Sanders, Liles & Sayles by Marci Talbot Liles, Little Rock, for appellant.

Mashburn & Taylor by W.H. Taylor, Fayetteville and Martin Law Firm, P.A. by Thomas A. Martin, Jasper, for appellees.

HAYS, Justice.

This appeal is taken from a jury verdict finding that horse racing activities by Amelee and Ruth Smith, appellees, was not a "business pursuit" under a farm owners policy of insurance issued by the appellant, Shelter Mutual Insurance Company. The question for review is whether the verdict is supported by substantial evidence.

Amelee and Ruth Smith live on 160 acres of land in southern Missouri where they maintain several thoroughbred race horses...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases