1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 883 F.2d
  5. 883 F.2d 43 (1989)
 

U.S. v. DUQUE

No. 88-3999.

883 F.2d 43 (1989)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jaime DUQUE, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided August 24, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles W. Isaly (argued), Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant-appellant.

John M. DiPuccio (argued), Office of the U.S. Attorney, Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before KEITH and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges; and GILMORE, District Judge.

GILMORE, District Judge.

This is a very straight-forward case involving the application of sentencing guidelines, where the sentence is within the guideline range. We affirm because the sentencing judge was not required, under the circumstances, to state with particularity his reasons for setting a sentence that falls within the guidelines where the guideline range was less than 24 months.

Appellant Jaime Duque was convicted, by a plea of guilty, of conspiracy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases