1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 873 F.2d
  5. 873 F.2d 50 (1989)
 

DEMENUS v. TINTON 35 INC.

Nos. 88-5835, 88-5931.

873 F.2d 50 (1989)

Manfred DEMENUS and Theodore Van Arthos, Appellants, v. TINTON 35 INC., Tinton 60 Inc., Homes For Today, Inc., Harvey I. Marcus, Jacques Rotnemer and Group Construction Co. of Ocean Township Inc., Spyco Inc., Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided April 25, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alan M. Lebensfeld (argued) and Robert M. Tils Cooperman Levitt & Winikoff, P.C., New York City, and Alice B. Newman, New Brunswick, N.J., for appellants.

Anthony P. La Rocco (argued), Michael D. Loprete, and Mark S. Sidoti, Crummy, DelDeo, Dolan, Griffinger & Vecchione, Newark, N.J., for appellee, Spyco, Inc.

Christopher J. Hanlon, Gross & Hanlon, P.C., Freehold, N.J., for appellee, Jacques Rotnmer.

Before GIBBONS, Chief Judge, and BECKER and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

BECKER, Circuit Judge.

This opinion addresses the question whether we have appellate jurisdiction over an appeal from a district court's interlocutory order discharging a notice of lis pendens under the New Jersey lis pendens statute. We hold that we do not.

I.

Plaintiff-appellants Manfred Demenus and Theodore Van Arthos brought suit in the district court for the District of New Jersey against their former real estate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases