U.S. AIRMOTIVE v. SOUTH CAROLIAN INS.

No. 87-393.

555 So.2d 366 (1989)

U.S. AIRMOTIVE, INC., Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA INSURANCE COMPANY, etc. and Seitlin & Company, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Rehearing Denied February 13, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, Miami, and Stephen N. Montalto, Coral Gables, and Edward A. Perse, Miami, for appellant.

Corlett, Killian, Hardeman, McIntosh & Levi and Richard J. Suarez; Miami, Touby, Smith, DeMahy & Drake and Kenneth R. Drake and Kathleen A. Touby, Miami, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., COPE, J., and GAVIN K. LETTS, Associate Judge.


GAVIN K. LETTS, Associate Judge.

Involved is a matter of burglary insurance coverage, the jury verdict absolving the insurer and apportioning the blame for the lack of coverage between the local insurance agent and the policy holder. We reverse.

The policy holder alleged its belief that it had burglary coverage at both of its business locations, but in fact, the terms of the policy only provided such coverage at one. As luck would have it, the burglary occurred...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases