1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.3d
  4. 47 Cal.3d
  5. 47 Cal.3d 863 (1989)
 

SHELDON APPEL CO. v. ALBERT & OLIKER

Docket No. L.A. 32267.

47 Cal.3d 863 (1989)

765 P.2d 498

254 Cal. Rptr. 336

SHELDON APPEL COMPANY, Cross-complainant and Respondent, v. ALBERT & OLIKER, Cross-defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of California.

January 12, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Hufstedler, Miller, Carlson & Beardsley, Shirley M. Hufstedler, Thomas & Elliott, Stephen L. Thomas and Peter O. Israel for Cross-defendant and Appellant.

Stephens, Berg, Lasater & Schulman, Stephens, Berg, Lasater, Schulman & Rogers, R. Wicks Stephens II and J. Lane Tilson for Cross-complainant and Respondent.

OPINION

ARGUELLES, J.

Albert & Oliker (A&O), a law firm, appeals from a judgment entered against it in a malicious prosecution action.1 The law firm contends that the trial court erred in permitting the case to go to the jury, asserting that the court should have concluded, on the basis of the uncontroverted facts, that Sheldon Appel Company (Sheldon Appel) had failed to establish one of the essential...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases