RUTHERFORD v. COUNTY OF KANDIYOHI

No. C7-89-1254.

449 N.W.2d 457 (1989)

John William RUTHERFORD, Appellant, v. The COUNTY OF KANDIYOHI, et al. and The Honorable Allan D. Buchanan, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied February 28, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel D. Reisman, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Robert G. Haugen, Minneapolis, for respondent, County of Kandiyohi.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Peter M. Ackerberg, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for respondent, Buchanan.

Heard, considered and decided by NORTON, P.J., and SCHUMACHER and FLEMING, JJ.


OPINION

WILLIAM J. FLEMING, Judge.

John Rutherford appeals from a judgment dismissing all five of his causes of action against the respondents. We affirm.

FACTS

In May 1987, appellant John Rutherford brought suit against the respondents for their participation in discharging him from employment as a probation officer in Kandiyohi County. Rutherford's termination letter stated:

The reasons for your termination are as follows:

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases