MATTER OF SENTRY INS. PAYBACK P. FILING

No. C4-89-837.

447 N.W.2d 454 (1989)

In the Matter of SENTRY INSURANCE PAYBACK PROGRAM FILING.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

November 7, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl E. Norberg, St. Paul, for appellant Sentry Ins. Co.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Karyn M. (Kim) Greene, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for respondent Minnesota Dept. of Commerce.

Heard, considered and decided by LANSING, P.J., and FOLEY and IRVINE, JJ.


OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Sentry Insurance appeals the Commerce Commissioner's order disapproving its Payback endorsement after a hearing under the Administrative Procedure Act, Minn. Stat. § 14.01 et seq. Sentry contends the Commissioner's action is not supported by substantial evidence and is arbitrary and capricious. We conclude that the record as a whole contains substantial evidence that the endorsement is misleading and violates public policy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases