MAUS, Judge.
The defendant was convicted of promoting pornography in the second degree. § 573.030, RSMo 1978 (now repealed). The statutes under which she was convicted defined the third element of pornography as "applying contemporary community standards: ... It lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value." § 573.010(1)(c), RSMo 1978, (now repealed). She contends her conviction was invalid because Pope v. Illinois,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.