1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 779 S.W.2d
  5. 779 S.W.2d 119 (1989)
 

ARMENTROUT v. MURDOCK

No. 01-88-00423-CV.

779 S.W.2d 119 (1989)

Joe Maurice ARMENTROUT, Appellant, v. John and Joann E. MURDOCK, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.).

Rehearing Denied November 9, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul S. Jacobs, Barnhart, Mallia & Cochran, Houston, for appellant.

Philip E. Hosey, Hosey, Presnall, Hosey & Feiglein, Houston, for appellees.

Before EVANS, C.J., and MIRABAL and DUNN, JJ.

OPINION

MIRABAL, Justice.

This is an appeal from a dismissal for want of prosecution.

In six points of error, appellant, Joe Maurice Armentrout, contends that the trial court erred in dismissing the case, and in overruling appellant's motion to reinstate.

The appellate standard of review of a dismissal for want of prosecution or the overruling of a motion to reinstate is whether there has been a clear abuse of discretion by the trial court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases