McGONIGLE v. CURRENCE


387 Pa.Super. 511 (1989)

564 A.2d 508

Patrick J. McGONIGLE and Marlene McGonigle, Appellants, v. William W. CURRENCE and Pamela Currence.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Filed September 28, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John P. Goodrich, Pittsburgh, for appellants.

Ray F. Middleman, Pittsburgh, for appellees.

Before BROSKY, POPOVICH and MONTGOMERY, JJ.


BROSKY, Judge.

Patrick J. McGonigle and Marlene McGonigle take the present appeal from an Order dismissing their de novo appeal from the award of arbitrators because the McGonigles and their counsel failed to appear at the arbitration hearing on the former's suit against William W. Currence and Pamela Currence, appellees herein.

On appeal, the McGonigles argue that the rules of civil procedure do not require a litigant to appear at an arbitration hearing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases