Defendant contends on this appeal that County Court failed to conform to Penal Law § 60.27 in requiring defendant to make restitution in the sum of $4,468 for damages to the vehicle he stole. He also challenges the constitutionality of the statute requiring restitution in the instant circumstances. Defendant contends that, although he stole the car, another person caused the damage to it. Defendant also urges that the sentence imposed...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.