1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 212 Cal.App.3d
  5. 212 Cal.App.3d 677 (1989)
 

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF ALEXANDER

Docket No. A042715.

212 Cal.App.3d 677 (1989)

261 Cal. Rptr. 9

In re the Marriage of CAROLYN and PATRICK ALEXANDER. PATRICK ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. CAROLYN ALEXANDER, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

July 27, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Eileen Ring and Joseph L. Strabala for Appellant.

James H. Disney for Respondent.

OPINION

KING, J.

In this case we hold that 1986 amendments to Civil Code section 5125, subdivision (e), have not changed the rule enunciated in In re Marriage of Stevenot (1984) 154 Cal.App.3d 1051, 1068 [202 Cal.Rptr. 116], that "After relief is no longer available under Code of Civil Procedure section 473 for mistake, inadvertance, surprise...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases