PER CURIAM.
We affirm. Appellant never argued to the trial court that the proof of the contents of the lost chattel mortgage was lacking. His objection to the distribution to the appellee of the remaining funds of this dissolved corporation stated that no chattel mortgage or security agreement was signed, a fact question upon which the court ruled against him based upon competent substantial evidence in the record. However, considering the note, the UCC financing...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
