Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
On the instant appeal, the defendant argues that his statements to the police should have been suppressed, since he was not given his Miranda warnings prior to custodial interrogation. We disagree.
The record indicates that on September 28, 1985, at about 1:30 A.M., a police officer observed the defendant standing in the doorway of a store which was closed for the night, making a side to side motion with his hand...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
