Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
At trial, the defendant objected to the court ruling which allowed the undercover officer, to whom he had sold cocaine to testify anonymously. The undercover officer testified that he did not want his name revealed in open court, that he was still an undercover officer making drug buys in the vicinity of the subject "buy and bust" operation, and that he was still assigned to the same special police unit as he had been when he...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
