1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 113 Wn.2d
  5. 113 Wn.2d 772 (1989)
 

STATE v. JACKMAN

No. 55836-1.

113 Wn.2d 772 (1989)

783 P.2d 580

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. WILFRED POPE JACKMAN, Petitioner.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

December 14, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Appelwick, Trickey, Sluiter & Spicer and Michael J. Trickey, for petitioner.

Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, and Donna L. Wise, Senior Appellate Attorney, for respondent.

DURHAM, J.

After a jury convicted Wilfred Pope Jackman of first degree robbery, the trial court ordered a new trial, citing jury misconduct, newly discovered evidence and a misstatement of fact by the prosecutor during closing argument. The Court of Appeals, in an unpublished opinion, reversed the order granting a new trial and reinstated the guilty verdict. State v. Jackman, noted at 53 Wn.App. 1002 (1988). We granted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases