MATTER OF ALAMO v. STROHM


74 N.Y.2d 801 (1989)

In the Matter of Agustin Alamo, Respondent, v. Gertrude Strohm et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents, and Israel Ruiz, Jr., Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided August 31, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin E. Connor for appellant.

Dominick A. Fusco for Agustin Alamo, respondent.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA concur; Judge ALEXANDER taking no part.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

Appellant, elected to the New York State Senate from the 32nd Senatorial District, was convicted of a felony in Federal court for making a false statement on a loan application (18 USC § 1014). Upon his conviction, his public office became vacant by operation of Public Officers Law § 30 (1) (e). The Appellate Division correctly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases