MARASHI v. LANNEN

No. 9201-1-III.

55 Wn. App. 820 (1989)

780 P.2d 1341

ALI MARASHI, ET AL, Respondents, v. HUGH C. LANNEN, ET AL, Appellants.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.

October 26, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin Weber and Lukins & Annis, P.S., for appellants.

Timothy Harkins and Parkins, Ryan & Harkins, for respondents.


MUNSON, A.C.J.

Hugh and Irene Lannen appeal the judgment imposing usury penalties equal to the amount of the principal owed to them on a promissory note by Ali and Batool Marashi.1 The Lannens contend the loan was exempt from the usury statutes under the business purpose exception, and evidence of the loan's alleged consumer purpose was insufficient to support the jury's verdict. We affirm.

Mr. Marashi contacted Rick Van Gelder...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases