1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 212 Cal.App.3d
  5. 212 Cal.App.3d 663 (1989)
 

BETTER ALTERNATIVES FOR NEIGHBORHOODS v. HEYMAN

Docket No. A043124.

212 Cal.App.3d 663 (1989)

260 Cal. Rptr. 758

BETTER ALTERNATIVES FOR NEIGHBORHOODS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. IRA MICHAEL HEYMAN, as Chancellor, etc., et al., Defendants and Respondents. NYINGMA INSTITUTE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

July 27, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Michael H. Weiss, Zach Cowan, Roger Beers, Cynthia Kochler and Jack Petranker for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, Jeffrey S. White, George A. Yuhas, Timothy P. Walker, James E. Holst and Gary Morrison for Defendants and Respondents.

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

OPINION

WHITE, P.J. —

Introduction

Petitioners Better Alternatives for Neighborhoods (BAN) and the Nyingma Institute1 (collectively appellants) appeal after the trial court denied their consolidated petitions for a writ of mandate to set aside the University of California's (University) decision to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases