MURPHY v. SENIOR SERVICES DIV.

CA A35334 (Control), CA A36438.

767 P.2d 104 (1989)

94 Or.App. 725

Dennis MURPHY, Dba Hood View Residential Care Home and Mt. Scott Residential Care Home, Petitioner, v. SENIOR SERVICES DIVISION, Respondent. Dennis Murphy, Dba Hood View Residential Care Home and Mt. Scott Residential Care Home, Petitioner, v. Mental Health Division, Respondent. and the Department of Human Resources, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 11, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Montgomery W. Cobb, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Arden E. Shenker, Portland, and Tooze Marshall Shenker Holloway & Duden, Portland.

Philip Schradle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before WARDEN, P.J. Pro Tem., and GRABER and RIGGS, JJ.


RIGGS, Judge.

Petitioner brings this action under ORS 183.400 to challenge administrative rules adopted by the Department of Human Resources (DHR) and two of its divisions, the Senior Services Division (SSD) and the Mental Health Division (MHD). We hold the challenged rules valid.

Petitioner operates two private residential care facilities that provide protective, supervised room and board to residents not in need of medical treatment or nursing care. Before...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases