Per Curiam.
The petition commencing this disciplinary proceeding contains four charges of misconduct which essentially allege that respondent neglected a client matter and thereafter failed to cooperate with petitioner in its investigation of the client's complaint. It is also alleged that respondent failed to comply with court rules and a directive of petitioner. By decision dated October 3, 1989, this court granted a motion by petitioner for an order declaring that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.