JOHNSON v. JOHNSON

No. CO-89-589.

439 N.W.2d 430 (1989)

In re the Marriage of Natalie JOHNSON, Petitioner, Appellant, v. Carl Peter JOHNSON, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

May 9, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack S. Jaycox, Kirk A. Myhra, Jack S. Jaycox Law Offices, Bloomington, for petitioner, appellant.

Robert J. Hajek, Warchol, Berndt & Hajek, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered at Special Term and decided by WOZNIAK, C.J., and NORTON and SHORT, JJ., without oral argument.


SPECIAL TERM OPINION

WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.

FACTS

The parties' marriage was dissolved in 1984. In October 1988 a contempt hearing was held regarding allegations that appellant Natalie Johnson had violated the terms of the original judgment and decree and an April 15, 1985 order. By order on November 29, 1988, the trial court found Natalie in contempt on numerous grounds and ordered that she be psychologically evaluated.1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases