Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court that the easement by grant to the plaintiff's predecessor in interest created only a conditional easement in the property in question, which expired by its own terms in 1925. Nor was an easement created in favor of the plaintiff's predecessor in interest by a 1927 deed between two other parties which purported to recognize an easement existing in favor of the plaintiff's property. It...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
