1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. B.R.
  4. 99 B.R.
  5. 99 B.R. 768 (1989)
 

IN RE REVCO D.S., INC.

No. 5:89-0149X, Bankruptcy Nos. 588-1308 to 588-1321, 588-1305, 588-1761 to 588-1812 and 588-1820, Adv. No. 588-0161.

99 B.R. 768 (1989)

In re REVCO D.S., INC., et al., Debtors. Lawrence J. MURRAY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ON-LINE BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, E.D.

March 21, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Silas Hopkins, III, Thomas R. Lucchesi, Baker & Hostetler, Cleveland, Ohio, for debtors.

Stuart E. Hertzberg, Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz, Detroit, Mich., for Trade Creditors' Committee.

Conrad Morgenstern, Cleveland, Ohio, U.S. Trustee.

Brad Eric Sheler, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, New York City, for Unsecured Noteholders' Committee.

Robert J. White, O'Melveny & Myers, Los Angeles, Cal., for Unofficial Committee of Secured Bank Lenders.

Richard Lieb, William J. Rochelle, Kronish Lieb, Weiner & Hellman, New York City, for Unofficial Preferred Equity Committee.

John R. Lee, S.E.C., Chicago, Ill.

Kevin Breen, George Rooney, Jr., Roetzel & Andress, Akron, Ohio, for plaintiffs Lawrence J. Murray and Raymond A. Fields.

Frank E. Quirk, Brouse & McDowell, Akron, Ohio, for On-Line Business Systems, Inc.

Keith E. Blaha, Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff, Cleveland, Ohio, for debtors and Leading Software Technology Corp.

ORDER REMANDING CASE

ANN ALDRICH, District Judge.

Upon consideration of the Motion for Remand to State Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1452(b), filed by Lawrence J. Murray and Raymond A. Fields, and upon review of the Report and Recommendations filed by the Bankruptcy Court, the court finds that the interests of justice will be best served by remanding the proceeding to the state court.

IT IS THEREFORE...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases