ARTHUR v. SUPREME COURT OF IOWA

Civ. A. No. 88-1340-B.

709 F.Supp. 157 (1989)

Lindsay G. ARTHUR, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs, v. The SUPREME COURT OF IOWA, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, C.D.

March 29, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark Bennett, Des Moines, Iowa, and Henry Monaghan, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Gordon E. Allen, Deputy Atty. Gen., Iowa Dept. of Human Services, Des Moines, Iowa, Elizabeth Osenbaugh, Mark Hunacek, James Gritzner, Kasey W. Kincaid, Nyemaster Law Firm, Des Moines, Iowa, for defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION, RULING GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND ORDER

VIETOR, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs are three Minnesota lawyers who want to be admitted to practice law in Iowa "on motion" under Iowa Supreme Court Rules 114 and 115. These rules permit an otherwise qualified non-resident lawyer who has practiced law elsewhere in the United States for at least five years to be admitted to practice law in Iowa without taking the state bar examination if he or she...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases