1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 388 S.E.2d
  5. 388 S.E.2d 473 (1989)
 

WILSON v. McLEOD OIL COMPANY INC.

No. 506A89.

388 S.E.2d 473 (1989)

325 N.C. 714

Ronald T. WILSON and Marilyn Wilson, Individually, and Ronald T. Wilson as Guardian ad Litem for Warren Craig Wilson, Christopher Thomas Wilson, and Matthew Reid Wilson, minor children, and Wendell Scott Wilson; Guy Hill and Marie Hill, Individually, and Guy Hill as Guardian ad litem for Emily Gwen Hill, minor child, and Craig Frederick Hill and C.N. White, Plaintiffs, and Walter Pagura, Sheila Pagura, and Beverley C. Pagura, Individually, and Sheila Pagura as Guardian ad litem for Bently Pagura, minor child, Intervenor Plaintiffs, v. McLEOD OIL COMPANY, INC., a North Carolina Corporation, Loren A. Tompkins, Adrian Simmons, and George Riggan, Defendants, v. ALAMANCE OIL COMPANY, INC., a North Carolina Corporation, and Hilda M. Baxter, Individually and as personal representative for Clifton E. Baxter, deceased; William Thomas Warren; Clyde H. Warren, Robert C. Warren, James Paul Warren, Odis H. Warren, Otis A. Warren and his wife Glenda Faye Warren, Third-Party Defendants.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 7, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hatch, Little & Bunn, Raleigh, for defendants McLeod Oil and Tompkins.

Smith, Patterson, Follin, Curtis, James & Harkavy, Asheville, for plaintiffs and intervenor-plaintiffs.

Mark E. Fogel, Raleigh, for defendant Simmons.

Glover & Petersen, Robert H. Hood, III, Graham, for defendant Riggan.

Henson, Henson, Bayliss & Coates, Greensboro, for Third-Party defendant Alamance Oil Co.

Frederick J. Sternberg, Graham, for Third-Party defendant Baxter.

Carruthers & Roth, Greensboro, for Third-Party defendants Otis Warren and Glenda Faye Warren.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal and the petition for discretionary review, filed by Plaintiffs and Intervenor Plaintiffs in this matter pursuant to G.S. § 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases