Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant was arrested shortly after he sold two vials of crack to an undercover officer who then radioed a description of the defendant to a backup team which apprehended him. Approximately an hour later the undercover officer identified the defendant at the police precinct. The defendant argues that both the precinct identification and in-court identification should have been suppressed as a result of the suggestive showup...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
