1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 210 Conn.
  5. 210 Conn. 646 (1989)
 

BOARD OF PARDONS v. FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION

(13502)

210 Conn. 646 (1989)

BOARD OF PARDONS v. FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decision released April 11, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl J. Schuman, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, were Clarine Nardi Riddle, acting attorney general, and John F. Gill, assistant attorney general, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Victor R. Perpetua, commission counsel, with whom, on the brief, were Mitchell W. Pearlman, general counsel, and Marianne D. Smith, assistant general counsel, for the appellee (named defendant).

PETERS, C. J., SHEA, CALLAHAN, GLASS and HULL, JS.

PETERS, C. J.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether the Appellate Court erroneously concluded that the plaintiff Board of Pardons (board) lacked standing to contest an order of the defendant Freedom of Information Commission (FOIC). The underlying controversy between the parties is the validity of an FOIC order requiring the board, in the future, to conduct its deliberations in public except under narrowly delimited circumstances...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases