Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court correctly denied his motion pursuant to CPL 270.10 challenging the jury panel. In neither the papers in support of the motion nor in the arguments made in support thereof did the defendant set forth any facts constituting the grounds of his challenge, as required by CPL 270.10 (2). The bare conclusions concerning an alleged discriminatory process of panel selection were...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
