Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the trial court erred by permitting the testimony of one of the police officer witnesses that after speaking with the victim of the robbery and assault he arrested the defendant. He claims that this testimony indirectly bolstered the identification of the defendant and was improper. This claimed error is not preserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05 [2]; People v West,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.