1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 710 F.Supp.
  5. 710 F.Supp. 135 (1989)
 

BRANTLEY v. E.F. HUTTON & CO., INC.

Civ. No. 86-1012.

710 F.Supp. 135 (1989)

Sidney BRANTLEY and Donna Brantley v. E.F. HUTTON & CO., INC.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

March 30, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven M. Kramer, Philadelphia, Pa., for Sidney and Donna Brantley.

Leonard Barrack, Philadelphia, Pa., Gerald J. Rodos, F. Joseph Warin, Joseph A. Ingrisano, Washington, D.C., for E.F. Hutton & Co., Inc.

OPINION

LOUIS H. POLLAK, J.

Defendant E.F. Hutton & Company, Inc. ("Hutton") moves to dismiss all of the counts of the plaintiffs' amended complaint for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). On count two of the amended complaint, defendant moves in the alternative for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Defendant also requests sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, arguing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases