AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CORP. v. SOUTHERN CAL. EDISON

Docket No. D009059.

216 Cal.App.3d 627 (1989)

266 Cal. Rptr. 662

AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

August 15, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Buchalter, Nemer, Fields & Younger, Bernard E. Le Sage, Steven M. Schott and Annee Della Donna for Plaintiff and Appellant.

James P. Montague and Donna M. Rovero for Defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

TODD, Acting P.J.

Automatic Sprinkler Corporation of America, a division of Figgie International, Inc. (Automatic), appeals after the trial court granted a summary judgment for Southern California Edison Company (Edison) in Automatic's action to enforce a mechanic's lien and to impose liability on Edison for failing to require its general contractor on the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) to post a payment bond...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases