Heard Jan. 10, 1989.
Decided March 13, 1989.
Per Curiam:
In this attorney disciplinary matter the respondent, Laurence Harmon Nida, was found to have violated S.C. Sup. Ct. R. 32, DR 9-102(B)(3) and (4). The Hearing Panel recommended a private reprimand. The Executive Committee unanimously adopted the Hearing Panel's findings of fact and conclusions of law, but recommended a public reprimand.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.