CHILES v. CROOKS

Civ. A. No. 3:88-1586-15.

708 F.Supp. 127 (1989)

Ronald A. CHILES and Patrick R. Hollis, Plaintiffs, v. Louis CROOKS, Individually and in his Capacity as a Wells Fargo Security Officer; and Security Group, Inc., d/b/a Wells Fargo Guard Services, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division.

February 1, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cameron M. Currie, Columbia, S.C., for plaintiffs.

George C. Beighley, Leslie A. Cotter, Jr., Richardson, Plowden, Grier & Howser, Columbia, S.C., for defendants.


HAMILTON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, Ronald A. Chiles and Patrick R. Hollis, instituted this action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983 alleging that defendant Louis Crooks deprived them of their federal constitutional and statutory rights. Plaintiffs' complaint also raises the pendent state law claims of malicious prosecution and intentional infliction of emotional distress against Crooks and Crooks' employer, Security Group, Inc., d/b/a Wells Fargo Guard...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases