1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 547 So.2d
  5. 547 So.2d 270 (1989)
 

TUCKER v. STATE

No. 88-1657.

547 So.2d 270 (1989)

Ronald TUCKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

August 2, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Lipinski, Miami, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

LETTS, Judge.

This cause is per curiam affirmed. However, one issue troubles us.

The question once more presented, as it was in Ringemann v. State, 546 So.2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989), and which we now certify as being of great public importance, is:

CAN A DEFENDANT, REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL, ORALLY WAIVE A JURY TRIAL, IF A FULL EXPLANATION OF THE CONSEQUENCES IS GIVEN...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases