1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 710 F.Supp.
  5. 710 F.Supp. 95 (1989)
 

BARR v. McGRAW-HILL, INC.

No. 87 Civ. 6259(KC).

710 F.Supp. 95 (1989)

Irving BARR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. McGRAW-HILL, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

April 7, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Cohen, New York City, and Carl Genberg, Columbus, Ohio, for plaintiffs.

Steven R. Hofstein, Gersten, Savage, Kaplowitz, Zukerman & Liebman, and Sullivan & Cromwell, New York City, for defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

CONBOY, District Judge:

Plaintiffs commenced this action against defendant McGraw-Hill, Inc. and others for common law and securities fraud, and breach of contract. McGraw-Hill now moves (i) to dismiss the fraud claims for failure to comply with Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b), (ii) to strike the demand for "benefit-of-the-bargain" damages in the fraud claims, and (iii) for summary judgment on plaintiffs' breach of contract claim on the ground that it...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases