Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the statement he made to the police should have been suppressed because he was so intoxicated that he was incapable of making a knowing and intelligent waiver of his constitutional rights. The defendant has failed to preserve that claim for appellate review (see, People v Gonzalez,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.