RADY v. LUTZ

No. 88-1873.

150 Wis.2d 643 (1989)

444 N.W.2d 58

Carl W. RADY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Holly LUTZ and Straub & Schuch, Defendants-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided May 2, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For plaintiff-appellant, there were briefs by Carl W. Rady, of Tomahawk.

For defendants-respondents, there was a brief by George A. Richards of Patterson, Richards & Hessert, of Wausau.

Before Cane, P.J., LaRocque and Myse, JJ.


LaROCQUE, J.

Carl Rady appeals a summary judgment dismissing his defamation action against attorney Holly Lutz and the law firm, Straub and Schuch. The allegedly defamatory statements were contained in a letter sent from Lutz to Ninth District Court Administrator James Seidel. The circuit court concluded that Lutz's statements were protected by the doctrine of absolute privilege. We agree and affirm.

Lutz defended the city of Tomahawk and its officials against...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases