1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 232 N.J.
  5. 232 N.J. Super. 559 (1989)
 

PISCOPO v. PISCOPO

232 N.J. Super. 559 (1989)

557 A.2d 1040

JOSEPH PISCOPO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. NANCY PISCOPO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, CROSS-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 1, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis W. Donahue argued the cause for appellant, cross-respondent (Skoloff & Wolfe, attorneys, Francis W. Donahue, of counsel, Francis W. Donahue and Phyllis S. Klein, on the brief).

Charles C. Abut argued the cause for respondent, cross-appellant (Lowen & Abut, attorneys, Louis J. Lamatina, on the brief).

Before Judges KING, BRODY and ASHBEY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by ASHBEY, J.A.D.

This is an appeal from the provisions of a judgment of divorce between plaintiff entertainer and comedian Joseph and defendant Nancy Piscopo. The novel issue raised by the trial judge's holding is that the marital property included plaintiff's "celebrity goodwill." See Piscopo v. Piscopo, 231 N.J.Super. 576, 580-581 (Ch.Div. 1988).

At trial plaintiff claimed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases