GERWIG v. BRUERE

No. 2-88-0611.

181 Ill. App.3d 609 (1989)

537 N.E.2d 844

JANET GERWIG et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LANCE BRUERE et al., Defendants (Lakehurst Joint Venture, Defendant-Appellee).

Appellate Court of Illinois — Second District.

Modified on denial of rehearing May 9, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Newton E. Finn and Sullivan, Smith, Hauser & Noonan, Ltd., both of Waukegan (Richard J. Smith, of counsel), for appellants.

Jody M. Pucel, of Haskell & Perrin, of Chicago (Stephen Sonderby, of counsel), for appellee.


Judgment affirmed.

JUSTICE McLAREN delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiffs appeal the decision of the trial court striking certain testimony in evidence and denying plaintiffs' motion to amend their complaint to conform to the proof. The trial court held that the testimony in question was not relevant to the allegations in the complaint and the proposed amendments did not, as a matter of law, constitute a lack of reasonable care given the facts of this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases