ARCO INDUSTRIES CORP., Plaintiff,
v.
The TRAVELERS INS. CO.; the Travelers Indemnity Co.; Kemper Insurance Co.; (American Motorists Ins. Co.); Consolidated American Ins.; Commercial Union Assurance; (Commercial Union Ins. Co.); the Home Indemnity Co.; Argonaut-Midwest Ins. Co.; Indiana Ins. Co.; CNA Ins. Co.; (American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa. and Continental Casualty Co.); and ABC Ins. Companies, Defendants.
United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, S.D.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 26, 1989.
On Motion for Relief from Judgment August 15, 1989.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
James Brown, Lansing, Mich., for Arco Industries Corp.
Roberts, Betz & Bloss by David Bloss, Grand Rapids, Mich., for Home Indem. Co.
Dickinson, Wright, Moon, Vandusen & Freeman by John M. Lichtenberg, Lansing, Mich., for Travelers Ins. Co.
Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone by Michael B. Ortega, Kalamazoo, Mich., for Kemper Ins. Co.
Kitch, Saurbier, Drutchas, Wagner & Kenney by Stephen Kelley, Detroit, Mich., for Indiana Ins. Co.
Kitch, Saurbier, Drutchas, Wagner & Kenney by Stephen Kelley, Detroit, Mich., Thomas Hamilton, Katherine Dedrick, Ronald Ohren, Chicago, Ill., for Argonaut-Midwest Ins. Co.
Schureman, Frakes, Glass & Wulfmeier by Steven Hickey, Detroit, Mich., for Commercial Union Ins. Co.
Drinker, Biddle & Reath by Timothy Russell, Washington, D.C., for American Motorists.
Oosterbaan, York, Cooper & Peterson by John N. Cooper, II, Kalamazoo, Mich., for Consolidated American Ins. Co.
Straub, Seaman & Allen by Drew F. Seaman, St. Joseph, Mich., for CNA Ins. Co.
Drinker, Biddle & Reath by Michael Kubacki, Thomas Schaufelberger, Philadelphia, Pa., for American Motorists Ins. Co.
Hinshaw, Culbertson, Moelmann, Hoban & Fuller by Thomas Hamilton, Katherine Dedrick, Ronald Ohren, Chicago, Ill., for Argonaut-Midwest.
Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone by Michael Ortega, Kalamazoo, Mich., for American Motorists Ins. Co.
United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, S.D.
OPINION
ENSLEN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on each defendant's motion to dismiss or for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the Court will grant those motions. Because I find that oral argument is unnecessary to resolve the issues presented, plaintiff's motion to consolidate the motions for hearing is denied as moot.
Facts
The plaintiff, Arco Industries Corporation ("Arco") manufactures automotive...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
