1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 208 Cal.App.3d
  5. 208 Cal.App.3d 580 (1989)
 

CITY OF HANFORD v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket Nos. F011558, F011559.

208 Cal.App.3d 580 (1989)

256 Cal. Rptr. 274

CITY OF HANFORD et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KINGS COUNTY, Respondent; GWF POWER SYSTEMS, INC., Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

March 6, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth, Marshall C. Whitney, Motschiedler, Michaelides & Wishon, James A. McKelvey, Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger, E. Clement Shute, Jr., Rachel B. Hooper, Winifred A. Berman, Remy & Thomas, Michael H. Remy, James G. Moose and Sharon E. Duggan for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Latham & Watkins, Christopher W. Garrett, Timothy C. Stutler and Philip G. Evans for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

THE COURT.* —

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Petitioners City of Hanford, Hanford City Council, Hanford Planning and Building Departments, Hanford City Planning Director James Beath and the individual city council members (City or Petitioners) seek a writ of prohibition or mandamus directing respondent Kings County Superior Court to vacate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases