1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Mass.
  4. 26 Mass.
  5. 26 Mass. App. Ct. 756 (1989)
 

MADAN v. ROYAL INDEMNITY CO.

No. 87-268.

26 Mass. App. Ct. 756 (1989)

532 N.E.2d 1214

ANIL MADAN vs. ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY.

Appeals Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk.

January 18, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nathaniel M. Gorton (Michael K. Barron with him) for the defendant.

Jeffrey B. Storer for the plaintiff.

Present: DREBEN, KASS, & SMITH, JJ.

SMITH, J.

Anil Madan, the plaintiff, an attorney, filed a complaint in the Superior Court, claiming that the defendant, Royal Indemnity Company, had committed a breach of an agreement to lease certain premises to him.1 He also claimed, among other things, that the defendant had engaged in an unfair or deceptive act or practice, in violation of G.L.c. 93A, §§ 2(a) and 11. The complaint sought specific performance and damages...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases