1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 209 Cal.App.3d
  5. 209 Cal.App.3d 568 (1989)
 

BURRELL v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

Docket No. B027696.

209 Cal.App.3d 568 (1989)

257 Cal. Rptr. 427

ROGER BURRELL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Appellants. LOS ANGELES CITY EMPLOYEES UNION et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. BOARD OF CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSIONERS, Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

April 10, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

James K. Hahn, City Attorney, Frederick N. Merkin and Robert Cramer, Assistant City Attorneys, for Defendants and Appellants.

Marr & Marchant, Cecil Marr and Diane Marchant for Plaintiffs, Respondents and Appellant.

OPINION

BOREN, J.

In this consolidated appeal, we consider the constitutionality of a portion of section 112 of the City Charter of Los Angeles. Section 112 gives a city employee the right to have the disciplinary measures ordered by an official in his or her department reviewed by the board of civil service commissioners (the Board). However, this charter provision limits the ability of the Board to reduce the disciplinary penalty...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases