PEOPLE v. CURCIO


148 A.D.2d 627 (1989)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Stephen Curcio, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

March 20, 1989


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court did not err in charging the jury that the defendant was an interested witness as a matter of law, particularly since the jury was further instructed that the other witnesses might be interested as well (see, People v Suarez, 125 A.D.2d 350, lv denied 69 N.Y.2d 750). Nor did the court err in refusing to charge that the prosecution witnesses were interested...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases