CARLINGFORD AUSTRALIA GEN. v. ST. PAUL F. & MARINE

No. 86 Civ. 9011 (CSH).

722 F.Supp. 48 (1989)

CARLINGFORD AUSTRALIA GENERAL INSURANCE LIMITED (Formerly Preservatrice Skandia Insurance Ltd.), Plaintiff, v. ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Aetna Insurance Company, Cigna Corporation and Marsh & McLennan, Inc., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

September 27, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mendes & Mount, New York City (Mary Ann D'Amato, Peter W. Birkett, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Miller Singer, Raives & Brandes, P.C., New York City (Lawrence I. Brandes, of counsel), for Aetna Ins. Co., St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. and CIGNA Corp.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HAIGHT, District Judge:

In this diversity action on a policy of reinsurance, defendant reinsurers move under Rules 13(f) and 15(a), F.R.Civ.P., to amend their answers to assert an affirmative defense and a counterclaim for rescission. Defendants state that if the amendment is allowed, they will move on its basis for summary judgment under Rule 56. Plaintiff reinsured resists the amendment on the ground inter alia of legal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases