1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 380 S.E.2d
  5. 380 S.E.2d 388 (1989)
 

STATE v. LANGDON

No. 8818SC1064.

380 S.E.2d 388 (1989)

STATE of North Carolina v. Vanna Elizabeth LANGDON.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

June 20, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Thornburg by Asst. Atty. Gen. Grayson G. Kelley, Raleigh, for the State.

McNairy, Clifford, Clendenin and Parks by Locke T. Clifford, Greensboro, for defendant-appellant.

EAGLES, Judge.

Defendant's first argument is that the trial court abused its discretion in summarily dismissing her first motion to suppress. Defendant's second argument is that the trial court erroneously denied her second motion to suppress. We find no prejudicial error.

A defendant who seeks to suppress evidence must comply with the procedural requirements of G.S. 15A-971, et seq. See State v. Satterfield, 300 N.C. 621

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases