1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 234 N.J.
  5. 234 N.J. Super. 534 (1989)
 

LA MANTIA v. DURST

234 N.J. Super. 534 (1989)

561 A.2d 275

JUDY A. LA MANTIA, PLAINTIFF, v. JOHN F. DURST, R.H. BORGERSEN, AND PAUL KLENOFF, DEFENDANTS. EVANS, OSBORNE & KREIZMAN, ESQS., PETITIONER-APPELLANT-CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. MONTE & MARRIOTT, ESQS., RESPONDENT-CROSS-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 28, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Kelly argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent (McElroy, Deutsch & Mulvaney, attorneys).

Thomas D. Monte, Jr., argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant (Monte & Marriott, attorneys; Thomas D. Monte, Jr., of counsel; Jamie S. Perri, on the brief).

Before Judges PETRELLA, GRUCCIO and LANDAU.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GRUCCIO, J.A.D.

This case typifies a disturbing trend prevalent in the modern legal profession. Petitioner Evans, Osborne & Kreizman (Evans Firm)1 asserts its claim to an apportioned percentage of a contingency fee realized by respondent Monte & Marriott (Monte Firm)2 from a personal injury action between plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases