Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the omission of an intoxication charge deprived him of his right to a fair trial. Initially, it must be noted that the defendant never requested such a charge, and did not raise an objection to the court's charge as given. Accordingly, his claim of error has not been preserved for appellate review as a matter of law (see, People v Carter,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.